Tuesday, January 15, 2008

not persuaded

"persuasion" 2007 is a mess. why is there a need for this new adaptation, when it chooses to focus on the same scenes from the book as the 1995 movie? make it a miniseries instead!

the cast is fairer than their 1995 counterparts, and that's its only claim to "superiority". the actors in the 1995 version achieved such a delicate rapport, all the characters playing off so beautifully against each other, like a intricately choreographed dance.

the 1995 version also touched upon genius with its ability to create episodes of sheer comedy out of the overall melancholy narrative. the 2007 version captured no such spontaneous joy.

much of the problems of the 2007 version is the decision to have scenes leap from one event to the next with no continuity. let the force of the scene sink in and draw upon the power of cinematography to convey subtlety of feelings words fail to express.

rating: 7/10

bottom line: "persuasion" 1995 is still the definitive adaptation.

Read more...

Sunday, January 6, 2008

persuasion


what! bbc has remade "persuasion"? can't wait for jan. 13 to roll around to watch/judge this version. it certainly has big shoes to fill given the near-perfect 1995 adaptation.

Read more...

no, "ma'am"

on new year's day, when i was at target surveying the shelves upon shelves of discount christmas merchandise, a college-aged trim blond let out an "excuse me ma'am" as she walked past in front of me. this isn't the first time i've been monikered "ma'am" by strangers, but never by people who're younger than me, so the remark especially stung for two reasons.

first, i obviously was disgruntled that she failed to recognize that I was still in my twenties, single, with no kids. i know this reason is shallow, has no merit, shouldn’t register on my righteous indignation meter, and should bear no mention. but even the best of us from time to time, will fall prey to vanity, so you can imagine how it is for those of us, like me, who only attempt to achieve mediocrity of character.

neither my age, place in life, nor dress warranted a "ma'am". well, now looking back, i made the mistake of wearing baby janes with oh-so noticeable white socks, which rendered me a bit matronly. i didn’t have the time to prim, prep, style, and accessorize because i hadn’t intended to spend the day outdoors. in fact, i had set aside the day for catching up on the backlog of work resulting from my freewheeling non-productivity the week before christmas. but i happened to notice target.com had some shoe and apparel items at 75% off the night before. not knowing my size, i decided to head out to my local target to try on some of the sale brands. by the time i finished browsing through target.com, it was already 4 a.m., and i figured i had to get the online transactions closed out asap for fear my size would get bought out. so i set my alarm for 7:45 a.m. (15 minutes before store opening time), but snoozed another hour, waking up around 9 a.m. i flew out the house kicking on the most easily accessible shoes, my slip-on red baby janes.

lesson learned: don’t wear socks with baby janes.

on the other hand, and more sobering and less rational, was the juxtaposition of the imbalance of life options between us. it was a slap in the face that she cemented this divide with “ma’am”.

lesson learned and relearned and will need to be relearned until it becomes second nature: as the french would say, “il faut cueillir la fleur quand elle est prête à être cueillie” or more familiarly here in the States, “seize the day”.

Read more...

Thursday, January 3, 2008

new year resolutions

in increasing order of difficulty:
1. keep promises
2. lose 20 lbs of fat
3. gain 5 lbs of muscle
4. adhere to a work hard/play hard lifestyle
5. visit machu picchiu

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP